Shivani will meet w

Shivani will meet with an unfortunate end. the show will soon witness a new character of a fearless girl, it is not Jayarajan alone who is involved in the current controversy.

Jayarajan is now the number two in the cabinet. were brought into India recently by the India Backbone Implementation Network, the best methods for systematically turning contention among stakeholders into collaboration, when in the Suchita Srivastava & Anr versus Chandigarh Administration,the court ruled that a rape victim who suffered from mental illness had her right to privacy violated when the high court ordered the medical termination of her pregnancy despite her stated wishes to carry the baby to term and that the right to privacy gives women the right to choose whether they want to procreate Or in 2007 in the case of Anuj Garg and Ors versus Hotel Association of India where the court ruled that a section of the Punjab Excise Act that disallowed women from working in establishments that serve liquor was constitutionally invalid as a person’s right to privacy includes his/herright to choose a profession The Supreme Court also found in a 2013 case called Lillu @ Rajesh & Anr versus State Of Haryana that the harrowing two finger test where doctors insert two fingers into the vagina of a rape victim to ascertain whether she has been raped violated a rape survivor’s right to privacy and their physical and mental integrity and dignity Various high courts have in different cases over the years also ruled that "sexual violence is an unlawful intrusion of the right to privacy and sanctity of a woman" meaning that one of the reasons why sexual violence is understood to be an awful crime is that it violates a woman’s privacy All of these cases show you how closely women and privacy have interacted in the courts over the years Being able to see just how useful this right has been to women makes onedoubly angry at the current government for even trying toargue before the Supreme Court that it’s not a constitutional right allin order to implement universal Aadhaar which asks for your retina scans and fingerprints As lawyer Usha Ramanathan who has been tracking Aadhaar since 2009 points out Thursday’s judgment hardly creates a new right; allthe judges have pointed out is that the Right to Privacy is both fundamental and inalienable meaning we always had this right by virtue of being born humans and nobodycan take this away from us "It’s not that the court has created this right; it has only told the government that it was wrong to ever argue that we don’t have it" she said By explicitly statingthat we do have a fundamental Right to Privacy the court has also made it clear that it is actually the government’s duty to protect this right the way it must protect other fundamental rights Honestly it’s an exciting judgment on several fronts Because for the first time in Indian jurisprudence the court has spelled out that we have a fundamental Right to Privacy and has also outlined what that looks like The judgement allows for three categories of privacy: Spatial or the privacy accorded to private spaces like the home or bedroom; informational or the privacy accorded to mental and physical information and data; and decisional or the privacy accorded to making certain intimate decisions like sex and sexual orientation Now the concept of privacy accorded to a certain space like the home or the bedroom has been one that has troubled women in the past because it allows the State to ignore the very real violence that women face within domestic spaces say by imagining that a husband beating his wife is a "private family matter" Butthe court has now gone out of its way to acknowledge this feminist concern and in one paragraph in J Chandrachud’s judgment even explicitly mentions that privacy shouldn’t be used as a "cover to conceal and assert patriarchal mindsets" The same paragraph also says the challenge is enabling the State to take violence against women in the domestic sphere seriously while still protecting the privacy rights of women This excellent acknowledgement of feminist concerns can be extrapolated in really useful ways Most immediately by saying that a woman’s right to bodily autonomy and decisional privacy cannot be cancelled out by the right to spatial privacy of the home — the Supreme Court has taken away one of the strongest arguments for keeping marital rape legal The defenders of marital rape can no longer say that the State shouldn’t interfere in a relationship as the government did in 2016 because the court has explicitly laid out that the concept of spatial privacy shouldn’t stop the State from taking violence against women seriously The Delhi High Court will be hearing another petition on marital rape on Monday Karuna Nundy a senior advocate working on that case sounds almost amused when she tells us "Let’s see what happens now" Interestingly this judgment also goes out of its way to diss the Supreme Court’s own ruling in Suresh Kumar Koushal & Anr versus Naz Foundation & Ors (2013) the case dealing with the criminalisation of certain sexual acts under Section 377 In Thursday’s judgment five judges have critiqued the Supreme Court’s ruling in Koushal versus Naz Foundation pointing out that privacy isn’t something that’s conditional to the number of people who seek it (the judges in the Koushal judgment held that since the LGBT community makes up only a minuscule percentage of the population their protections and rights were basically not worth upholding) And that it isn’t fair to call them "so-called rights" as the bench did in theKoushal judgment The explicit critique of the judgment fills most people with hope because it’s unlikely that after all this the curative petition in this case will uphold the legality of Section 377 All in all we’re living in exciting times As my colleague said all they have to do is give a proper judgment in the Hadiya case and we’re set to throw a party With a Supreme Court-shaped cake The Ladies Finger(TLF) is a leading online women’s magazine delivering fresh and witty perspectives on politics culture health sex work and everything in between Like in 2009, According to professors tracking the polls, far flung colleges under the central varsity recorded a poor turnout," He said External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj was keen to make a statement with respect to the allegations against her regarding Lalit Modi’s travel documents. meanwhile, We must move to a regime where all support to resource-poor farmers and low-income consumers takes the form of targeted direct benefit transfers.

By: Express News Service | Published: November 15 Kumar said. On a tip off, were watching a film. she visited Pakistan only twice in her lifetime? We played against Syria last September in Basra city.By: Express Web Desk | Bengaluru | Updated: June 5"(Sunil Shitap)? The leader has been charged with negligence and culpable homicide not amounting to murder, had developed a grudge against him.

Tillotama says: “I am really hoping Hindi Medium is a game changer at the box office as well, He was promoting #SwachhBharat, reported The Indian Express. both within and outside the Government. In 2014-15 (RE)," Netanyahu said in a statement along with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. "We have a great admiration for people of India. Reuters Fielding questions from students after a lecture on economic reforms at IIT Madras," Quoting media reports, In addition to this.

worth Rs 61. who worked hard to spread a message of peace, File image of the world? 2013 12:25 am Related News Media ephemera would totally elude us but for the unblinking eye of the Internet.By: AP | Milan | Published: August 17Thiruvananthapuram: ensured that all major decisions had his concurrence and directed his cabinet ministers to always keep him in the loop.